[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [wsbpel-spec-edit] updated spec committed
Did I just miss the (very short) call? I somehow used the wrong PC and
called 10 mins late...
Paco
"Satish Thatte"
<satisht@microsof To: "Alex Yiu" <alex.yiu@oracle.com>, Francisco Curbera/Watson/IBM@IBMUS
t.com> cc: "Alex Yiu" <alex.yiu.alex.yiu@oracle.com>,
<wsbpel-spec-edit@lists.oasis-open.org>
04/26/2005 01:01 Subject: RE: [wsbpel-spec-edit] updated spec committed
AM
thanks. should be a short call tomorrow. i need to leave by 10 am anyway
:-)
________________________________
From: Alex Yiu [mailto:alex.yiu@oracle.com]
Sent: Mon 4/25/2005 12:42 PM
To: Francisco Curbera
Cc: Alex Yiu; wsbpel-spec-edit@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [wsbpel-spec-edit] updated spec committed
Paco, thanks!
And, I will first re-apply the changes lost in the CVS migration
(related to what Danny raised in Issue 205).
Regards,
Alex Yiu
Francisco Curbera wrote:
>I committed the spec and main schema with the changes for issue 112. In
the
>amended resolution there was no reference to the <reply> activity (which
>should also be covered by this resolution) so I added that (in the BNF
>syntax in section 6.2 and 11.4, and in the text in 11.4). I also updated
>the schema accordingly.
>
>The pen goes to Alex.
>
>Paco
>
>
>
>
> Alex Yiu
> <alex.yiu@oracle. To: Francisco
Curbera/Watson/IBM@IBMUS
> com> cc: Satish Thatte
<satisht@microsoft.com>, Assaf Arkin <[email protected]>,
> "Furniss, Peter"
<Peter.Furniss@choreology.com>, bpel spec
> 04/14/2005 05:47
<wsbpel-spec-edit@lists.oasis-open.org>, [email protected], Alex Yiu
> PM <alex.yiu@oracle.com>
> Subject: Re:
[wsbpel-spec-edit] updated spec committed
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Hi Paco,
>
>I do not need to get the pen now, if you want to finish 112.
>Now I assume the pen is in Paco's hand for now until he finishes 112.
>
>Thanks!
>
>
>Regards,
>Alex Yiu
>
>
>Francisco Curbera wrote:
> I think I had the pen to apply 112, once I clarify the details with
> Yaron,
> which I will try to do right now.
>
> Paco
>
>
>
>
> "Satish Thatte"
>
> <satisht@microsof To: "Furniss,
> Peter" <Peter.Furniss@choreology.com>, Francisco
> t.com>
> Curbera/Watson/IBM@IBMUS, "bpel spec"
> <wsbpel-spec-edit@lists.oasis-open.org>, "Alex
> Yiu"
> <alex.yiu@oracle.com>
>
> 04/14/2005 12:27 cc:
> <ygoland@bea.com>, "Assaf Arkin" <[email protected]>
>
> PM Subject: RE:
> [wsbpel-spec-edit] updated spec committed
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks Peter. Alex, I believe you have the pen to finish 111.1 as
> well as
> 102 and 103.
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: Furniss, Peter [mailto:Peter.Furniss@choreology.com]
> Sent: Thu 4/14/2005 9:04 AM
> To: Satish Thatte; Francisco Curbera; bpel spec
> Cc: ygoland@bea.com; Assaf Arkin
> Subject: RE: [wsbpel-spec-edit] updated spec committed
>
>
>
> Editors,
>
> I've just updated the "Resolved issues awaiting editing" table -
I've
> left 111.1 as awaiting, since the schema isn't done yet, but marked
> 93
> as done.
>
> Peter
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Satish Thatte [mailto:satisht@microsoft.com]
> Sent: 12 April 2005 18:21
> To: Francisco Curbera; bpel spec
> Cc: ygoland@bea.com; Assaf Arkin
> Subject: RE: [wsbpel-spec-edit] updated spec committed
>
>
> Dear Editors,
>
> After Paco is done, I suggest the following assignments
>
> Alex: 102, 103, 111.1 (XSD)
>
> Assaf: 29, 81, 160
>
> Satish: 86, 130, 139, 186
>
> Yaron: 132, 136, 154
>
> Passing the pen in that order. I believe Alex and Assaf are
> up and running with SourceForge. Alex needs to finish the
> XSD work on 111.1 which Paco has completed in the text.
> Yaron and I are not yet up with SourceForge, so this lets us
> procrastinate a bit more. Putting Yaron last to give him
> time to hit us with the 22 additional issues he is working on
> :-)
>
> Let me know if this is acceptable.
>
> We still have 126, 140 and 163 open for other editors to
> volunteer for.
>
> Satish
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Satish Thatte
> Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 10:09 AM
> To: 'Francisco Curbera'; bpel spec
> Cc: 'ygoland@bea.com'
> Subject: RE: [wsbpel-spec-edit] updated spec committed
>
> Yaron and Paco need to sync up and tell us the status of 93
> and 112. Paco still has the pen. More mail on issues will
> follow.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Francisco Curbera [mailto:curbera@us.ibm.com]
> Sent: Saturday, April 02, 2005 10:10 PM
> To: bpel spec
> Subject: [wsbpel-spec-edit] updated spec committed
>
> I took the job of applying the following issue resolutions:
> 12.1, 93, 111.1 and 112.
>
> - 12.1 had already been applied (in fact I had already done
> so a month ago
> - we need to update the "Resolved issues awaiting editing
> into spec" table).
>
> - 93 has been applied to the spec AND the wsbpel_main.xsd
> schema. Note that the last text change for section 13.4 was
> defined in the resolution terms of the pre-12.1 text; the
> post-12.1 text already incorporates an equivalent change -
> Yaron, can you please check?
>
> - 111.1 has been applied to the spec, but I agreed to work
> with Alex on the schema; I believe Alex will be taking a
> first pass at updating wsbpel_main.xsd once he get the pen.
>
> - 112 - I am a bit unsure about what is the final resolution
> for this one; Yaron's resolution was amended (by me and
> Danny) to use the form
>
> <toPart part="ncname" fromVariable="ncname"/>
>
> and to not require a precise ordering of parts; I am not sure
> if this amendments apply as well to the <fromPart...> spec,
> or the <fromPart...> spec was left as in the original
> proposal. The minutes do not seem to say anything so I would
> appreciate everyone's help in reconstructing what exactly was
> decided (Yaron as the sponsor of the resolution probably
> remembers better than me) - then I will dutifully apply it to
> the spec.
>
> So I am keeping the pen for now, pending some clarification on
> 112.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Paco
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]