Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 288 - Clarification of DPE and Sequence

[Dieter Koenig1 <dieterkoenig@de.ibm.com>]

The <invoke> is executed. There is no DPE as there is no link from <empty>
to <invoke>. 11.6.5. shows a similar example. Which place in the spec
suggests that the <invoke> is not executed?

Kind Regards
DK
                                                                       
 Dieter K�nig                                Mail: dieterkoenig@de.ibm.com         IBM Deutschland Entwicklung GmbH
                                                                       
 Senior Technical Staff Member               Tel (office): (+49) 7031-16-3426      Sch�naicher Strasse 220
                                                                       
 Architect, Business Process Choreographer   Fax (office): (+49) 7031-16-4890      71032 B�blingen
                                                                       
 Member, Technical Expert Council            Tel (home office): (+49) 7032-201464  Germany
                                                                       





                                                                       
             ws-bpel issues                                            
             list editor                                               
             <peter.furniss@er                                          To
             ebor.co.uk>               wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org     
                                                                        cc
             18.05.2006 00:13                                          
                                                                   Subject
                                       [wsbpel] Issue - 288 -          
             Please respond to         Clarification of DPE and Sequence
             wsbpel@lists.oasi                                         
                s-open.org                                             
                                                                       
                                                                       
                                                                       
                                                                       




This issue has been added to the wsbpel issue list with a status of
"received". The status will be changed to "open" if a motion to open the
issue is proposed and that motion is approved by the TC. A motion could
also be proposed to close it without further consideration. Otherwise it
will remain as "received".


The issues list is posted as a Technical Committee document to the OASIS
WSBPEL TC pages on a regular basis. The current edition, as a TC document,
is the most recent version of the document entitled in the "Issues" folder
of the WSBPEL TC document list - the next posting as a TC document will
include this issue. The list editor's working copy, which will normally
include an issue when it is announced, is available at this constant URL.
Issue - 288 - Clarification of DPE and Sequence


Status: received
Date added: 17 May 2006
Date submitted: 17 May 2006
Submitter: Danny van der Rijn
Description: If an activity in a sequence is skipped due to a
joinCondition, does the next activity get executed?


Consider the following:

<sequence suppressJoinFailure="yes">





    <empty>
       <targets>
          <joinCondition>false</joinCondition>
          <target ... />
       </targets>
    </empty>





    <invoke .../>
<sequence>



The <empty> activity will never be run. Will the invoke activity get
skipped as well?


I don't think so, but the spec could be interpreted either way.
Changes: 17 May 2006 - new issue



To comment on this issue (including whether it should be accepted), please
follow-up to this announcement on the wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org list
(replying to this message should automatically send your message to that
list), or ensure the subject line as you send it starts "Issue - 288 -
[anything]" or is a reply to such a message. If you want to formally
propose a resolution to an open issue, please start the subject line "Issue
- 288 - Proposed resolution", without any Re: or similar.


To add a new issue, see the issues procedures document (but the address for
new issue submission is the sender of this announcement).


--------------------------------------------------------------------- To
unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates
this mail. You may a link to this group and all your TCs in OASIS at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php