Re: [wsbpel] new issue - clarification on whether the QName of afault needs to be unique across all portTypes and operations

[Prasad Yendluri <pyendluri@webmethods.com>]

Hi Thomas,

I do not see a problem. Can you please explain why you think there would be a problem?

Regards,
Prasad

Thomas Schulze wrote:

Hi Prasad,

a portType definition like the following would lead to problems, IMHO:

    <portType name="My.Port.Type">
        <operation name="My.Operation">
            ...
        </operation>
    </portType>

Best regards/Mit freundlichen Grüßen,

       Thomas Schulze



                                                                           
             Prasad Yendluri                                               
             <pyendluri@webmet                                             
             hods.com>                                                  To 
                                       Thomas Schulze/Germany/IBM@IBMDE    
             24.07.2006 15:53                                           cc 
                                       alex.yiu@oracle.com,                
                                       Ronald.Ten-Hove@Sun.COM,            
                                       wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org         
                                                                   Subject 
                                       Re: [wsbpel] new issue -            
                                       clarification on whether the QName  
                                       of a fault needs to be unique       
                                       across all portTypes and operations 
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           




Hi Thomas,

Why do we need such a limitation?  The local part is just an NCName
(i.e. the LocalPart of the QName).

Regards,
Prasad

Thomas Schulze wrote:

  

Hi Prasad,

so the only *new* limitation with this proposal would be that portTypes
    

and
  

operatins must not contain the "." character when used with BPEL. Right?

Best regards/Mit freundlichen Grüßen,

      Thomas Schulze