[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: [wsia-comment] [wsrp][wsia][interfaces][wsrp-wsia jointinterfaces] Discussion o utline for face2face
We should probably kick off a discussion of the relative importance of the
criteria Rex outlined (thanks Rex!)
My order (basically critical success factors ranked higher than
functionally required criteria):
- Functionality => why would developers/vendors care if it must be
extended by each environment in order to be useful.
- Flexibility => if the standard can't be used on common platforms/tools,
it will fail to be adopted.
- Performance => page load time is a major success factor on the web
- Privacy => (Includes security) Critical for many targetted applications,
but not all
- Simplicity => make adoption as easy as possible
- Expressiveness => Both the mentioned tooling and advanced WSIA use cases
require this
- Modularity => We are working on the first of these
- Extensibility => breaking the inherently extensible WSDL model would be
a bad thing
Alan Kropp
<akropp@epicentri To: wsia-comment@lists.oasis-open.org,
c.com> wsrp-comment@lists.oasis-open.org
cc:
06/19/2002 08:12 Subject: [wsia-comment] [wsrp][wsia][interfaces][wsrp-wsia joint
PM interfaces] Discussion o utline for face2face
As we discussed in the last joint interfaces call, here is my draft of the
outline to guide the discussions during next week's f2f on interface
issues.
#### joint interfaces f2f discussion.htm has been removed from this note on
June 20 2002 by Rich Thompson
#### joint interfaces f2f discussion.doc has been removed from this note on
June 20 2002 by Rich Thompson
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC