xacml — archive

[Bill Parducci]

i know that it is late to bring this up, but i find the term 'post condition' unintuitive. typically, this phrase means the *state* of something after an action, not something to be acted upon. it seems that the way we are using the term implies quite a bit about the context of what is being done. (post what? where?) i think this is being demonstrated by the discussions surronding the scope of said phrase. in my mind, it would seem that something like 'adjunct policy' or 'adjunct policy condition' would be more appropriate? just typing out loud... b > [PM-1-02] - The alternative view is that post-conditions must be > executed if and only if the associated rule contributes to the permit > decision.