xacml — archive
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
— [Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Month Index]
| [List Home]
RE: [xacml] on postconditions
MHonArc v2.5.2 -->xacml message
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: [xacml] on postconditions
- From: Hal Lockhart <[email protected]>
- To: 'Simon Godik' <[email protected]>,'John Erickson' <[email protected]>, [email protected]
- Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 14:55:14 -0500
Title: RE: [xacml] on postconditions
I
clearly remember that the sense of the group was that the PDP MUST insure that
an internal post condition occurs, but not necessarily before the permit
decision is returned. Post conditions were never considered optional. They are
just as required for "permit" as pre-conditions are. That was the rationale for
the name.
Hal
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] — [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Month Index] | [List Home]