xacml — archive

RE: [xacml] We resolve ...

From: Carlisle Adams <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 15:21:00 -0000

Title: RE: [xacml] We resolve ... Hi, Thanks, Ken, for the summary. The amount of discussion around resolutions has been surprisingly low so far. Should Hal and I interpret the silence to mean that everyone is ready to vote in favour of Tim's proposals? Should we interpret the champion-free and/or resolution-free issues as low priority, or "don't care" topics? I look forward to further feedback on today's policy model subcommittee call and at the F2F on Wednesday and Thursday. Carlisle. ---------- From: Ken Yagen[SMTP:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 6:46 PM To: 'Carlisle Adams'; 'XACML' Subject: RE: [xacml] We resolve ... FYI The following issues do not have champions: PM-5-04, PM-5-05 The following issues do not have any proposed resolutions: PM-2-02, PM-5-05, MI 1-01, MI-4-01, MI-4-02, MI-4-04 (new one on Java Security Model) Ken