Re: [xacml] XACML August 22, 2002 Minutes

[Anne Anderson <Anne.Anderson@Sun.com>]

On 22 August, Ken Yagen writes: [xacml] XACML August 22, 2002 Minutes
 >  [Anne, 21 Aug 2002] Conformance Tests:
 > Some was waiting on Daniel and Polar to complete functions. 
 > Anne suggests remove description of test suite and just state it is
                                                 V
                               from "Conformance (normative)" section of spec
 > available. Test suite is an aid to developers who wish to attest to
 > conforming to XACML. It is not required and Simon feels language should be
 > made clearer to communicate that. Wording says that it is required for
 > attestation of successfully using but not for conformance. Test suite is not
 > as broad as conformance table. Attesting of successful use means you are
 > passing the test suite. Conformance is determined independently. Hal
 > suggests it should be the other way around. Anne said we want to avoid it
 > seeming like a branding program. Other committees have not been concerned
 > about interoperability or completeness in determining attesting of
 > successfully using. Are the three implementers going to implement the
 > complete mandatory sections?

Anne
-- 
Anne H. Anderson             Email: Anne.Anderson@Sun.COM
Sun Microsystems Laboratories
1 Network Drive,UBUR02-311     Tel: 781/442-0928
Burlington, MA 01803-0902 USA  Fax: 781/442-1692