xacml — archive

RE: [xacml] Proposal on item 7 ConditionReference

From: Polar Humenn <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2003 15:02:00 -0000

 MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->

















xacml message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]








Subject: RE: [xacml] Proposal on item 7 ConditionReference




From: Polar Humenn <[email protected]>
To: Daniel Engovatov <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2003 10:05:34 -0500 (EST)






On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, Daniel Engovatov wrote:

> >I think I know where you are going with this, but I don't think the LET
> >statement will do that for you. What we want is to simply reference
> values
> >amongst different rules.
>
> Within single policy, or across all policies?  Probably I missed
> something..

With in a single policy. I think we predicated the apporach based on that.

> I am not suggesting that the proposed idea would not work - just the
> longer I look at our architecture, the more I feel that more cross
> policy information needs to be provided.  Let expressions being one of
> them, instead of condition references.

I understand.

-Polar


>
> Daniel;
>
> > For example a place to define five-minutes-from-now attribute of
> > datetime type defined as (add-time current-time 5 minutes) and so on.
> >
> >
> > Daniel;
> >
> >