xacml — archive

RE: [xacml] [Issue] Would it be SO bad if we dropped the

From: Tim Moses <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 21:34:00 -0000

 MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
















xacml message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]








Subject: RE: [xacml] [Issue] Would it be SO bad if we dropped the <Function> element?




From: Tim Moses <[email protected]>
To: "'Polar Humenn'" <[email protected]>, Tim Moses <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 16:41:28 -0500






Polar - OK.  Thanks for reminding me.  With your permission, I will
"improve" the text in Section 5.25 (the explanation of <Function>).  I think
it should say that it is only used if the parent <Apply> element takes a
function name as an argument (for example, if it is one of the standard
higher-order bag functions) and that (in this case) the function MUST return
a boolean result.

At the moment, the text says that the <Function> element is only present
when the parent <Apply> element is one of the standard higher-order bag
functions.  I think you are suggesting its use could be more general.

I hope you are fully enjoying the quiet time before the onslaught starts
again.  Speak to you soon.  All the best.  Tim.