xacml — archive

RE: [xacml] Removing A7 - A11

From: Tim Moses <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2004 19:22:00 -0000

 MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
















xacml message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]








Subject: RE: [xacml] Removing A7 - A11




From: Tim Moses <[email protected]>
To: "'Polar Humenn'" <[email protected]>, "'Seth Proctor'" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 14:34:46 -0500 






Polar - The map, as I understood it, was that:

Sections 5 and 6 would describe processing rules directly related to a
particular element type;

Section 7 would describe any processing rules that could not be associated
with a particular element type; and

Appendix A would describe standard data-types and functions.

We haven't followed this map consistently.  For example, A11 describes the
<Function> element and really provides no additional value over that
provided by 5.28 Element <Function>.

Where several elements require identical processing, it seems appropriate to
reference a common section in Section 7.  Then Appendix A should be reserved
for describing the data-types and functions identified with a URI.

Are there objections to this approach?  All the best.  Tim.