xacml — archive

[Anne Anderson <anne.anderson@sun.com>]

 MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->




















xacml message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]








Subject: Re: [xacml] request's attribute assertion lifetime?




From: Anne Anderson <Anne.Anderson@Sun.COM>
To: Frank Siebenlist <franks@mcs.anl.gov>
Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2004 08:58:03 -0500






On 4 March, Frank Siebenlist writes: Re: [xacml] request's attribute assertion lifetime?
 > It just intrigues me why we have this InstantIssue element of the attribute 
 > defined? What was the use case for that?

Good question.  I think it should be removed.  Why didn't we
include validity interval?  It would have made more sense, but we
didn't.  I think both fall into the category of "things the
Context Handler is supposed to check".

Anne
-- 
Anne H. Anderson             Email: Anne.Anderson@Sun.COM
Sun Microsystems Laboratories
1 Network Drive,UBUR02-311     Tel: 781/442-0928
Burlington, MA 01803-0902 USA  Fax: 781/442-1692







Follow-Ups:

Re: [xacml] request's attribute assertion lifetime?
From: Polar Humenn <polar@syr.edu>



References:

request's attribute assertion lifetime?
From: Frank Siebenlist <franks@mcs.anl.gov>
Re: [xacml] request's attribute assertion lifetime?
From: Polar Humenn <polar@syr.edu>
Re: [xacml] request's attribute assertion lifetime?
From: Frank Siebenlist <franks@mcs.anl.gov>
Re: [xacml] request's attribute assertion lifetime?
From: Frank Siebenlist <franks@mcs.anl.gov>






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]