xacml — archive

Re: [xacml] request's attribute assertion lifetime?

From: Seth Proctor <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 19:13:00 -0000

 MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->

xacml message

[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]

Subject: Re: [xacml] request's attribute assertion lifetime?

From: Seth Proctor <[email protected]>
To: XACML TC <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 14:27:35 -0500

On Mon, 2004-03-15 at 16:53, Frank Siebenlist wrote:
> Polar Humenn wrote:
> 
> > If you take the approach that all attributes have validity intervals, then
> > they may have many validity intervals. Hmmm, how about the Cantor set?
> 
> ... and definitely not a Cantor Set like problem ... which I take to be some 
> attempt of humor by a (perverted) mathematician ... ;-)

For those who are curious, a Cantor set is (without getting too precise
and mathy) a set that is closed but disconnected. The cannonical example
is the Cantor Middle-Thirds set, which is constructed by removing the
middle third from a set, removing the middle third from the remaining
sets, etc. This results in "a lot" of intervals :)

seth

References:

RE: [xacml] request's attribute assertion lifetime?
From: "Daniel Engovatov" <[email protected]>
Re: [xacml] request's attribute assertion lifetime?
From: Frank Siebenlist <[email protected]>
Re: [xacml] request's attribute assertion lifetime?
From: Polar Humenn <[email protected]>
Re: [xacml] request's attribute assertion lifetime?
From: Anne Anderson <[email protected]>
Re: [xacml] request's attribute assertion lifetime?
From: Frank Siebenlist <[email protected]>
Re: [xacml] request's attribute assertion lifetime?
From: Polar Humenn <[email protected]>
Re: [xacml] request's attribute assertion lifetime?
From: Frank Siebenlist <[email protected]>

[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]