[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Minutes of August 18 2005 XACML TC Meeting
Hal Lockhart
Tim Moses
Bill Parducci (minutes)
Erik Rissanen
David Staggs
Ron Williams
Anne Anderson
Argyn Kuketayev
Polar Humenn
Michiharu Kudo
Tony Nadalin
Quorum reached (90% per Kavi)
Agenda:
I. Minutes from August 4 meeting (as updated on list) voted upon:
Approved unanimously
No objections
Oasis Procedural note: Voting privileges are based on 2 contiguous
meetings rule; miss 2 meetings in a row and lose voting privileges;
attend 2 meetings in a row, regain voting privileges after second
meeting.
II. F2F
The chairs will post a poll with the last 2 weeks of September and
the first week of October, East Coast/West Coast BEA facilities.
III. Conformance Tests
Argyn reviewed his work on moving the v1.x Conformance Tests to
v2.0. They are in a draft state, have been validated against the
v2.0 schema but have not been run against an actual implementation.
Additional tests (e.g. functions with parameters) need to be added.
IV. New Delegation Draft (0.8)
Erik reviewed the changes to the latest word. No major structural
changes, most modifications pertain to readability and consistency.
V. Issues
Issues are now tracked in the Oasis wiki:
http://wiki.oasis-open.org/xacml/IssuesList
Hal suggested a formatting modification to clarify the status of
issues. discrete values: OPEN, PENDING, PENDING REVIEW, CLOSED and
DEFERRED.
Issue 24 - the current draft does not allow this, Hal offered that
this be added to the next draft. Anne objected to this based on
policy retrieval optimization. Hal offered that policy retrieval is
based upon either request type and is evaluated in that context
separately. Hal will modify the wiki entry to more fully describe.
Issue 25 - since processing depth may be masked it is currently not
possible to know the level of recursion without a way to pass
recursion information through the processing chain (request
context).
Issue 26 - addressing impacts of Deny policies rights on
administrative policies. Hal offered that there isn't value in
differentiating between the ability to permit access or deny.
Polar offered that evaluation may be clarified by introducing
Trusted/Untrusted results (with possibility of differentiation
between ability to issue negative/positive policies)
Issue 27 - PDP policy set Issuer
Issue 28 - Delegate-id
Currently not considered a significant issue.
Issue 29 - Situation
Should Situation be defined as proposed on wiki?
VI. Misc.
Bill will contact Tim to review Generalized Decisions with respect
to Obligations.
The TC will continue to use Kavi as the mechanism for tracking
action items, but members are encouraged to use the wiki for
maintaining issues and as a place for introducing ideas/concepts.
meeting adjourned.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]