Proposed Agenda for 26 February 2009 TC Meeting

["Rich.Levinson" <rich.levinson@oracle.com>]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Time: 10:00 am EDT
Tel: 512-225-3050 Access Code: 65998

Proposed Agenda for 26-Feb-09 TC Meeting:

10:00 - 10:05 Roll Call
 
10:05 - 10:15 Administrivia

 Approve Minutes
  19 February 2009 TC Meeting Minutes
   http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200902/msg00039.html

  RSA Conference: April: 
   Hal planning to give "advanced talk"


10:15 - 11:00 Issues
[Documents posted]
 Proposed rev: Hierarchical Resource Profile uploaded by Rich (2/23): 
 (re: issue below)
  http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200902/msg00056.html

 XACML 3.0 Core WD08 uploaded by Erik (2/5): (reminder, for review)
  http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200902/msg00003.html

[New Issues]

 Comment on combining algorithms in Core WD07
  Erik reply fix is made (is it in wd8 or next?)
   http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200902/msg00054.html

 Hierarchical profile
  Rich raised need for addressing to severe issue, based on results
  of in-depth discussions last week in addition to Jan discussions:
   http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200902/msg00055.html
  also provided proposed changes to spec to address issues:
   http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200902/msg00056.html

[carryover from previous meetings]

 Open Issues in SAML Profile
  any status changes on actions (see minutes):
   1. Disallow inheritance semantics from request data; Suggested
     proposed text in this email:
      http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200902/msg00013.html
   2.Required methods to obtain policies from refs: none or some? 
      Generally: what to do about "missing policie"
  Hal indicated would provide a proposal on ws-fed attr type stuff

 Multiple Request Proposal
  Erik proposal to add MultiRequest element to core schema:
   http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200902/msg00014.html
    still was question on xml:id; where do we stand overall
    on what's next here?

 RBAC Profile
  Darran follow-up to discussion in 5-Feb-09 minutes:
  (no change: Darran has indicated will produce proposal that can
   be defined within current RBAC profile functional domain)
   http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200902/msg00008.html