[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Minutes 26 February 2009 TC meeting
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Time: 10:00 am EDT
Tel: 512-225-3050 Access Code: 65998
Proposed Agenda for 26-Feb-09 TC Meeting:
10:00 - 10:05 Roll Call
Voting Members
Erik Rissanen Axiomatics AB
Bill Parducci Individual
Rich Levinson Oracle Corporation
Hal Lockhart Oracle Corporation
Anil Saldhana Red Hat
John Tolbert The Boeing Company
Members
Anthony Nadalin IBM
We have quorum
10:05 - 10:15 Administrivia
Approve Minutes
19 February 2009 TC Meeting Minutes
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200902/msg00039.html
accepted, no objection
Meeting schedule:
will continue to meet weekly thru the end of March, then
revisit
RSA Conference: April:
Hal planning to give "advanced talk"
no more info
10:15 - 11:00 Issues
[Documents posted]
Proposed rev: Hierarchical Resource Profile uploaded by Rich (2/23):
(re: issue below)
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200902/msg00056.html
discuss below
XACML 3.0 Core WD08 uploaded by Erik (2/5): (reminder, for review)
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200902/msg00003.html
reminder to people: review
[New Issues]
Comment on combining algorithms in Core WD07
Erik reply fix is made (is it in wd8 or next?)
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200902/msg00054.html
Erik: planned for WD09
Hierarchical profile
Rich raised need for addressing a severe issue, based on results
of in-depth discussions last week in addition to Jan discussions:
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200902/msg00055.html
also provided proposed changes to spec to address issues:
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200902/msg00056.html
STATUS: OPEN
Rich: explained the proposal
discussion: mostly on following topics:
differences in ancestor collection and how done in
both schemes: DAG and forest
conceptualization of forest, which is disjoint, having
"intersections" - the concept in the proposal is that
the resources themselves should be viewed as an unstructured
collection, which has org applied to it in the form of
hierarchies.
In the forest scheme, Hal suggested each defined hierarchy
has a different distinguishing color, so one can see that
a particular resource might have multiple lines crossing
it, one for each hierarchy of which it is a member.
The same conceptualization applies to DAG as well, except
does not show spreading of DAG hierarchies to include
automatic members that are children of parents from the
original hierarchy where the children were not in that
hierarchy the parent belonged to, but are now because they
are the child of that parent from a different hierarchy
that they both did originally belong to.
ACTION: rich: provide an easy example in separate email;
other TC members: review proposal
[carryover from previous meetings]
Open Issues in SAML Profile
any status changes on actions (see minutes):
1. Disallow inheritance semantics from request data; Suggested
proposed text in this email:
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200902/msg00013.html
2.Required methods to obtain policies from refs: none or some?
Generally: what to do about "missing policie"
Hal indicated would provide a proposal on ws-fed attr type stuff
Comments indicated all ok and rev in progress.
Multiple Request Proposal
Erik proposal to add MultiRequest element to core schema:
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200902/msg00014.html
STATUS: OPEN
still was question on xml:id; where do we stand overall
on what's next here?
Hal using xml:id now, in 2009, is way to go. 5 yrs ago, the
canonicalization did not work correctly but now it does
people now using exclusive canonicalization
no reason not to use it.
Hal: do not need to declare xml:id
Erik: tried it, but there was problem
Hal: possibly parser used is not supporting xml:id
Erik: xsd specification is how you use xml: namespace
Rich: sig pkgs use id without schema validation
Hal: need to declare the ids
Erik: "note D2" of xml:id spec is the "issue"
Hal: drop not to Norm Walsh of Sun, one of spec's authors
spec is - "xml:id Version 1.0": w3c tr recommendation
http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-id/
this note points to "Minimally conforming schema processor",
which sounds like ability to handle xml:id w/o other schema
validation, also it says
"Note that the effects of a Minimally Conforming Schema
Processor, processing the above schema, are approximated
by simply looking for attributes named xml:id, ensuring
the value of such attributes has the correct lexical form
(NCName), and the value is unique within the document."
ACTION: Erik to drop A notE to Norm Walsh of Sun, one of spec's
authors, based upon Hal's suggestion
RBAC Profile
no change: if proposal is delivered for Role Enablement Authority
capabilities or example of best practices, we will evaluate. Note:
profile already does provide specific URN to indicate an REA:
"urn:oasis:names:tc:xacml:2.0:subject-category:role-enablement-authority"
presumably an example would build on this foundation.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]