xacml — archive

[Rich Levinson]

Minutes for January 21, 2010 TC Meeting: Tel: 513-241-0892 Access Code: 65998 NOTE: Starting next week mtgs will be biweekly at 1PM ET. 10:00 - 10:05 Roll Call: Erik Rissanen Paul Tyson Gareth Richards Sridhar Muppidi Bill Parducci Rich Levinson Hal Lockhart Seth Proctor John Tolbert Voting Members: 9 of 14 (64%) (used for quorum calculation) we have quorum Individual Attendance Members: 9 of 112 (8%) Approve Minutes: 14 January 2010 TC Meeting http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/201001/msg00043.html approved, no objection Adminsitrivia V3 Next steps Follow-up from last week: People should have had time to review doc set and be prepared to vote on whether to advance to CS. Hal: People are ready to vote for CD Erik: spreadsheet up to date except couple f2f items Erik: diff since review in August, every spec is compared to previous; if take 2-3 drafts together all there Hal: scope of review now is just chgs since cd -> (from last week) is there admin prep needed? Hal: section 2.19 of cd process; cross references - may need to be enhanced: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/201001/msg00039.html ** In xacml-3.0-core-spec-wd-16en.doc: [Hier], [Multi], [XACMLAdmin] ** In xacml-3.0-administration-v1-spec-wd-27-en.doc: [XACML] ** In xacml-3.0-dsig-v1-spec-wd-05-en.doc: [XACML], [XACML-SAML] ** In xacml-3.0-hierarchical-v1-spec-wd-12-en.doc: [MULTIPLE], [XACML] ** In xacml-3.0-multiple-v1-spec-wd-09-en.doc: [Hierarchical], [XACML] ** In xacml-3.0-privacy-v1-spec-wd-06-en.doc: [Hier] ** In xacml-3.0-rbac-v1-spec-wd-07-en.doc: [XACML] ** In xacml-profile-saml2.0-v2-spec-wd-12-en.odt: [ADMIN], [XACML3] hal: ok, above is current state and will be incorporated to release to tc-admin -> (from last week) conformance: "Erik will request an opinion from Mary as to whether the conformance sections of all the documents are satisfactory." Has this been done? hal/erik: conf sections should be ok erik: move to go to committee draft sridhar: seconds hal: hears no objection: motion passes bill: moves to go to 30 day review rich: seconds hal: hears no objections: motion passes sridhar: RSA in early March has some interest in 3.0 hal: unlikely to delay 3.0 prog, due to anything that comes out at RSA, so let's move ahead hal: would like to schedule NextLabs tools demo: best to devote entire meeting: talked about moving mtg to 1, every other week reason for current time was: people in far east ' consensus 1PM ET; every other week will meet next week if NextLabs can do demo, will be discretion if not want to keep on sched w next week as being a 2wk base general: is there some consistency about vendors doing presentations - demos, not "sales pitches" hal: demos of unique and interesting capabilities, not plain vanilla access control; but authoring tools, analysis tools, things that have evolved beyond the specs. hal: when members present they are already under agreement; outsiders less clear, but nothing of non-disclosure type should be presented. Issues Determine what issues, if any, remain open for V3. From last week: "PDP advertising what its capabilities" any more to be said on that? hal: have agreement in principal that we will have a metadata profile and gather identifiers/semantics "question was raised as to whether an implementation supporting the wire protocol, but not using an XACML compliant PDP, could claim conformance " hal: personal: what says in conf of saml profile; it is arguably reasonable to comply w decision req profile even if not using xacml pdp other views welcome: we will revisit as needed -> action item: erik: create cd version w headers -> meeting next week: Jan 28, 2010 1PM ET meeting adjourned: 10:37 AM ET