Proposed Agenda for 21 March 2013 TC Meeting (Mtg time: 4:30PM ET = 20:30 GMT)

[rich levinson <rich.levinson@oracle.com>]

Time: 16:30 EDT (GMT-0400; i.e. 20:30 GMT)
 Tel: 513-241-0892
 Access Code: 65998

 Proposed Agenda for 21 March 2013 TC Meeting

 I. Roll Call & Minutes

   Approve Minutes:
    7 March 2013 TC Meeting
    https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/201303/msg00023.html

 II. Adminstrivia

  What time will upcoming TC meetings be held at?
   https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/201303/msg00062.html
   Starting today the new meeting time is 4:30PM ET
   Since ET is now EDT, this is GMT -0400
    i.e. today's meeting is at 16:30 ET=EDT = 20:30 GMT

  Status EC-US/IPC Profiles
   The  Committee Spec (CS) version of the EC-US and IPC profiles
    have been published by TC-Admin:
     IPC:
      https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/201303/msg00028.html
     EC-US:
      https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/201303/msg00029.html
   TC-Admin, john tolbert provided attestation sample w instructions:
    https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/201303/msg00053.html
    https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/201303/msg00049.html
   Attestations submitted:
    Boeing EC-US:
     https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/201303/msg00047.html
    Boeing IPC:
     https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/201303/msg00048.html
    Axiomatics EC-US and IPC:
     https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/201303/msg00060.html
    ViewDS EC-US and IPC:
     https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/201303/msg00063.html
    Oracle EC-US and IPC:
     https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/201303/msg00066.html

  RSA 2014 Interop commitments due by Mar 28, 2013 for OASIS premier space:
  RSA 2014 OASIS Demo Proposal - richard hill
    https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/201303/msg00031.html
   hal: comments to Jane Harnad on proposal logistics issues
    https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/201303/msg00037.html

  Status XACML REST Profile - any updates?
   15-day public review announced on Mar 1, 2013
    https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/201303/msg00000.html

  RSA 2013 Interop update
   Post-Conference materials:
    Action Item: Hal will gather materials from interop, confirm
                approval to share and post demo materials.

  XACML 3.0 OS: need process for issues and errata: (action: set up wiki)
   From Mar 7 minutes:
    https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/201303/msg00023.html
   Hal: There is an official process for errata. Main limitation is
        only releasable annually. The wiki is likely the best place to
        capture the errata.

  XSPA healthcare profile was uploaded March 7:
   https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/201303/msg00022.html
   

 III. Issues

  XSPA - XACML Obligation Profile for Healthcare Version 1.0
   comments are expected
    Comments on spec:
     Steven:
      https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/201303/msg00050.html
     Erik:
      https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/201303/msg00059.html

   Other comments related to the spec and/or obligations:

    Hal: issues related to obligations:
     https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/201303/msg00020.html
      Erik:
       https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/201303/msg00020.html
      Mohammad:
       https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/201303/msg00024.html
      David Chadwick:
       https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/201303/msg00025.html
       https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/201303/msg00027.html
      Mohammad:
       https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/201303/msg00026.html
      Steven:
       https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/201303/msg00038.html

     Rich: followup on comment on ambiguities in core spec wrt Obligations
      https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/201303/msg00030.html
       clarification on defn of ambiguity in this context:
        https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/201303/msg00039.html
      several additional emails expanding on the issue:
       most recent from bill:
        https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/201303/msg00065.html
       steven:
        https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/201303/msg00064.html
       others:
        https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/201303/maillist.html
         see those entitled:
          "Re: [xacml] Minutes 7 March TC Meeting - action on ambiguity
           wrt set of returned Obligations, Advice"

  REST Profile: steven: question on schema availability:
   https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/201303/msg00014.html
   ray's reply:
    https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/201303/msg00018.html


  XACML 3.0 core OS new issues: add these to errata wiki:
   Specific cases of multiple category elements need definitive
    process descriptions; in particular, is there reqt that a
    pdp decision must be based on at most one element per category
    per decision.
     https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/201303/msg00003.html
   Ambiguity between normative text in section 5.56 <StatusCode> wrt
    cardinality of StatusCode/StatusCode [Any Number] and the
    xml schema defn that has cardinality 0:1.
     https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/201303/msg00005.html