[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Minutes 19 September 2013 TC Meeting
I. Roll Call & Minutes
Roll Call
Voting Members
Hal Lockhart (Chair)
Bill Parducci (Chair)
Crystal Hayes
Richard Hill
Mohammad Jafari
Steven Legg
Rich Levinson
Remon Sinnema
Danny Thorpe
John Tolbert
Quorum reached.
100% (per Oasis site)
Approve Minutes:
5 September 2013 TC Meeting
Approved unanimously.
I. Roll Call & Minutes
Approve Minutes:
5 September 2013 TC Meeting
https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/201309/msg00003.html
II. Administrivia
OASIS IDtrust Member Section Steering Committee Elections
Now Closed
Groups - DLP-NAC profile uploaded
Hal: FYI: NAC = Network Access Control, DLP = Data Loss Prevention
John: Posted to being review and discussion by the TC
Mohammad: there seems to be a similarity to this and rights
management Languages?
Hal: The original requirements for XACML included aspects of Rights
Management. The two concepts are quite similar.
John: Is there something specific that the TC may be able to benefit
from?
Misc
John: Working session planned for October is on hold for now
Combining Algorithm question
Noted: https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/201309/msg00006.html
XACML v3.0 errata page
Bill: Erik posted a message to the list noting that he had responded
to the topics raised to date.
DPM TEM XACML Slide Content
Richard: I'd like to collect feedback from the TC and provide it
back to the DPM group.
Hal: As noted on list, the SAML Profile is a Committee Specification
so it has indeed been updated for XACML v3.0
III. Issues
Policy Distribution
Richard: I still intend to Use Cases for this
Hal: I will present some Use Cases in the Profile that you can add to
ForAny Procedural
Steven: Noted that Erik agreed with the general approach proposed
by him.
Rich: I am still working on a set of functions to address this.
XPath in XACML (background)
Bill noted that Erik provided background information on the nature of
XPath with respect to the XACML specification.
Related and Embedded Entities Profile - Starter
Steven: This is my solution to the attributes and relations topic.
IP Addresses
Hal: The response to the question about IP data type matching not
being possible because it doesn't have a canonical form doesn't
make sense.
Bill: That is correct, once you have identified IPv4 vs IPv6. There
are two paths you can choose for matching: netmask or simple
text. Netmask is the more typical. It doesn't have the concept
of "wildcards" per se. For example 192.168.1.0/24 is how the
text version of "192.168.1.*" would be represented.
Mohammad: This also applies to exchange of policies in Exchange Profile
for Policies.
Hal: Any Use Cases that seem applicable are welcome into the discussion.
meeting adjourned.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]