[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [xri] Status of RelaxNG
You'll notice that we've had, for quite a while, a placeholder in the XRI
resolution specs for a RelaxNG schema for the XRD & XRDS documents. We
decided against using RelaxNG early on because we feared that it would be
tilting just a *bit* to far at windmills. That may not be the case any more.
RelaxNG is a different way of thinking about document correctness, but in
many cases, its far simpler and is in closer alignment to what you are
actually trying to do with a schema...
-Gabe
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Drummond Reed [mailto:drummond.reed@cordance.net]
> Sent: Monday, December 04, 2006 1:50 PM
> To: xri@lists.oasis-open.org; [email protected]
> Subject: [xri] Status of RelaxNG
>
> Cross-post to XRI & XDI TC lists:
>
> Laurie Rae pointed out to me the following posts relative to the status of
> adoption of RelaxNG -- it appears its elegance is steadily winning more
> support.
>
> http://cafe.elharo.com/xml/relax-wins/
>
> http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/200x/2006/11/27/Choose-Relax
>
>
> =Drummond
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]