[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [xdi] XDI graph as XRIs
Hi Drummond,
Then, I suppose,
=markus
+friend
=bill.barnhill
will be expressed as =markus/+friend of which resolved value will be
=bill.barnhill and the XRI itself is not =markus/+friend/=bill.barnhill.
Is that right?
=nat
Drummond Reed wrote:
>
> Markus,
>
>
>
> This subject has indeed come up several times before. I know Bill has
> suggested that, when looked at from an RDF graph standpoint, every XDI
> document can be represented as the set of RDF statements that appear
> in the document. This would include all those whose object is a literal.
>
>
>
> However when we refer to “the set of XRIs” represented by an XDI RDF
> document, I have proposed that if the object of an XDI RDF statement
> is a literal, the literal is NOT part of the XRI. In other words, if
> you have the XDI RDF statement…
>
>
>
> =markus
> +email
> "markus.sabadello@gmail.com <mailto:markus.sabadello@gmail.com>"
>
>
>
> …the XRI that identifies the literal object of this statement (using
> direct concatenation syntax) is:
>
>
>
> =markus/+email
>
>
>
> That’s as far as we’ve gone discussing it.
>
>
>
> Is there any reason that rule will not work?
>
>
>
> =Drummond
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> *From:* Markus Sabadello [mailto:markus.sabadello@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Friday, May 16, 2008 6:12 PM
> *To:* Bill Barnhill
> *Cc:* Nat Sakimura; tatsuki@nri.com; [email protected]
> *Subject:* [xdi] XDI graph as XRIs
>
>
>
> Hey Bill,
>
> I'm sitting together with Nat and Tatsuki, talking about various XDI
> topics. One issue that came up was the following: I think it was you
> who suggested a few times that every XDI document can be expressed as
> a simple list of XRIs, right?
>
> For example, if I have this XDI graph:
>
> =markus
> +friend
> =bill.barnhill
> =drummond
>
> I could just express it using these XRIs:
>
> =markus/+friend/=bill.barnhill
> =markus/+friend/=drummond
>
> Right?
>
> Now the question is, how does that work with literals? If I have this:
>
> =markus
> +email
> "markus.sabadello@gmail.com <mailto:markus.sabadello@gmail.com>"
>
> Then what's the XRI that represents this statement? I'm sure someone
> has thought about that before, but I don't really remember how it
> works or if it works at all?
>
> Markus
>
--
Nat Sakimura (=nat)
Nomura Research Institute, Ltd.
XDI.ORG Vice Chair
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]