[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] (XDI-11) 3.4.1 - Clarification
[ https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/XDI-11?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Peter Davis updated XDI-11:
---------------------------
Labels: editorial (was: )
> 3.4.1 - Clarification
> ---------------------
>
> Key: XDI-11
> URL: https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/XDI-11
> Project: OASIS XRI Data Interchange (XDI) TC
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: XDI Core
> Affects Versions: 1.0
> Reporter: Hubert Le Van Gong
> Assignee: Joseph Boyle
> Labels: editorial
>
> "The XDI address of the common root node is the empty address. Thus any XDI statement that does not begin with a peer root address or an inner root address is by definition relative to the common root node."
> Q1: does this imply that such statement (per 2nd sentence) has an empty address?
> Q2: as I read this, I wondered how the 2nd sentence doesn't contradict the 100% addressability goal (for the object node)?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2.2#6258)
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]