xliff-inline — archive
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
— [Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Month Index]
| [List Home]
RE: [xliff-inline] 1.3. Must be able to represent paired codes that have been separated
Hi Yves,
I have no rationale to prefer one over the other to be named idref. It was an oversight - my fault for not taking the larger set of issues into account.
I see "nid" referred to in 1.12.3.1. Is there something to do with the "n" in "nid" that makes it intuitive for its use? If not I would prefer it to be an idref as well.
- Bryan
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
— [Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Month Index]
| [List Home]