[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: [xliff] <bin-unit> problem
Hi John & all,
The way I've been handling data for icon, bitmaps, etc. is by using a
corresponding <trans-unit>. For example, in your case I would do something
like this:
<bin-unit id='1' translate='yes' reformat='yes'
mime-type='image/icon'>
<bin-source>
<external-file href="btnadvanced.gif"/>
</bin-unit>
<trans-unit id='0' coord='0;0;86;16'>
<source/>
</trans-unit>
</bin-unit>
If the icon size changes I would expect the localized document to be:
<bin-unit id='1' translate='yes' reformat='yes'
mime-type='image/icon'>
<bin-source>
<external-file href="btnadvanced.gif"/>
</bin-unit>
<trans-unit id='0' coord='0;0;86;16'>
<source/>
<target coord='0;0;94;24'/>
</trans-unit>
</bin-unit>
I guess you can generalize this as using the first <trans-unit> of a
'container' as the place to put data that go with the container. Here the
'container' would be the icon (with possible text in it).
Wouldn't that work for you John?
On a side note I'd like to remind everyone that this is a good example why
going through profiles of different formats would 'have been'/'be(?) better
before we close the next major version of XLIFF. I'm pretty sure we'll have
some surprises when trying to work with Windows resources such as
MESSAGETABLE, FONT, FONTDIR, GROUP_ICON, GROUP_CURSOR, MENUEX, etc. And that
is for Win32 resources only.
kenavo and have a great week-end,
-yves
-----Original Message-----
From: John Reid [mailto:JREID@novell.com]
Sent: Fri, February 07, 2003 2:07 PM
To: >
Subject: [xliff] <bin-unit> problem
Hi All,
I have just now come across a situation where we have icons that are being
localized. In doing this we need to keep track of the change in size of the
icon. However, the current definition of <bin-unit> does not have that
information. In the <trans-unit> we have the coord attribute to store that
info. Since we are at a 1.0 implementation, we could use a <prop> to give us
that info but I prefer the <context> since we can codify it and make it
understandable to translators, provided that the tools understand it.
<bin-unit id="1" mime-type="image/gif" translate="yes" reformat="yes">
<bin-source><external-file href="btnadvanced.gif"/></bin-source>
<context-group name="translation">
<context context-type="bin-coord">0;0;86;16</context>
</context-group>
</bin-unit>
The better solution would be to add coord as an attribute of <bin-unit> and
<bin-target>. After all, what does reformat control for <bin-unit>? The
only attributes that could be reformatted are mime-type, restype, and
resname. We may need the other following attributes:
coord <bin-unit> and <bin-target>
size-unit <bin-unit> only
maxheight <bin-unit> only
minheight <bin-unit> only
maxwidth <bin-unit> only
minwidth <bin-unit> only
The above could then be expressed as follows.
<bin-unit id="1" mime-type="image/gif" translate="yes" reformat="yes"
coord="0;0;86;16">
<bin-source><external-file href="btnadvanced.gif"/></bin-source>
</bin-unit>
If someone has come across this same problem and found a different solution,
I would appreciate the help. Otherwise, as much as I don't want to delay the
process, we may want to consider taking care of this now. What do you think?
thanks,
john
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC