[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] (XLIFF-28) Comments in the draft
David Filip created XLIFF-28:
--------------------------------
Summary: Comments in the draft
Key: XLIFF-28
URL: https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/XLIFF-28
Project: OASIS XML Localisation Interchange File Format (XLIFF) TC
Issue Type: Bug
Components: ITS Module
Affects Versions: 2.1_csprd02
Environment: http://markmail.org/thread/jzdqfm5c6hgofjbu
Reporter: Yves Savourel
Assignee: David Filip
Priority: Minor
Fix For: 2.1_cs01
There are quite a few (more than a dozen) embedded comments in this latest
draft:
e.g: "COMMENT: MAKE CLEAR THAT THERE ARE TWO HANDLINGS, ONE IS NOT TO REPRESENT
THE DATA CATEGORY, THE OTHER IS IN THE MODULE. THE
EXTRACTION IS FOR ITS PROCESSORS GENERATING XLIFF, THE DIRECT REPRESENTATION IS
FOR XLIFF PROCESSORS."
Some, like the one above, seem to indicate that there are still relatively
important parts of the text that needs to be
edited/added/etc.
I assume this means there will be a csprd03 regardless of the disposition of the
comments for csprd02. Is that correct?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2.2#6258)
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]