[OASIS Issue Tracker] (XLIFF-28) Comments in the draft

[OASIS Issues Tracker <workgroup_mailer@lists.oasis-open.org>]

    [ https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/XLIFF-28?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=65359#comment-65359 ] 

David Filip commented on XLIFF-28:
----------------------------------

Removed VERSAL editorial comments in Localization Quality Issue.

All were addressed in csprd01 or csprd02, except one:

ADD AN EXAMPLE OF TOOLS ANNOTATION THAT PROCESSES STANDOFF MARKUP, SO THAT THE
    INHERITANCE OF TOOLS ANNOTATION (= RELATED TO THE ACTUAL CONTENT; NOT THE STANDOFF INFORMATION)
    BECOMES CLEAR. SHOW WHAT HAPPENS IF THERE ARE TWO VALUES TO STANDOFF WITH ANNOTATORSREF IN
    PARALLEL, E.G. THE FOLLOWING IN THE SAME &lt;target> ELEMENT: </para>
  <para>&lt;mrk id="m1" type="its:generic"
    its:annotatorsRef="localization-quality-issue|toolXYZ1"</para>
  <para> its:locQualityIssuesRef="#itsm=lqi1">c'es le conteneur&lt;/mrk> </para>
  <para>&lt;mrk id="m1" type="its:generic"
    its:annotatorsRef="localization-quality-issue|toolXYZ2"</para>
  <para> its:locQualityIssuesRef="#itsm=lqi1">c'es le conteneur&lt;/mrk> 

Assigning to Felix to add such an example..

> Comments in the draft
> ---------------------
>
>                 Key: XLIFF-28
>                 URL: https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/XLIFF-28
>             Project: OASIS XML Localisation Interchange File Format (XLIFF) TC
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: ITS Module
>    Affects Versions: 2.1_csprd02
>         Environment: http://markmail.org/thread/jzdqfm5c6hgofjbu
>            Reporter: Yves Savourel
>            Assignee: David Filip
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: Proposed, editorial, request_tc_discussion, work_required
>             Fix For: 2.1_csprd03
>
>
> There are quite a few (more than a dozen) embedded comments in this latest
> draft:
> e.g: "COMMENT: MAKE CLEAR THAT THERE ARE TWO HANDLINGS, ONE IS NOT TO REPRESENT
> THE DATA CATEGORY, THE OTHER IS IN THE MODULE. THE
> EXTRACTION IS FOR ITS PROCESSORS GENERATING XLIFF, THE DIRECT REPRESENTATION IS
> FOR XLIFF PROCESSORS."
> Some, like the one above, seem to indicate that there are still relatively
> important parts of the text that needs to be
> edited/added/etc.
> I assume this means there will be a csprd03 regardless of the disposition of the
> comments for csprd02. Is that correct?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2.2#6258)