[OASIS Issue Tracker] (XLIFF-40) Docbook anchors with itsm_ prefixes for its: attributes

[OASIS Issues Tracker <workgroup_mailer@lists.oasis-open.org>]

    [ https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/XLIFF-40?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=65423#comment-65423 ] 

David Filip commented on XLIFF-40:
----------------------------------

Thanks, Yves, this has not been Resolved, just Proposed.
I agree that the Proposal doesn't address the Docbook anchors directly, so I also agree we can have a won't fix resolution, as the situation became clearer mainly due to edits for https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/XLIFF-41 and its subtask https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/XLIFF-36.

> Docbook anchors with itsm_ prefixes for its: attributes
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: XLIFF-40
>                 URL: https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/XLIFF-40
>             Project: OASIS XML Localisation Interchange File Format (XLIFF) TC
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: ITS Module
>    Affects Versions: 2.1_csprd02
>         Environment: http://markmail.org/thread/skncl7tvvjq4p4nu
>            Reporter: Yves Savourel
>            Assignee: David Filip
>            Priority: Trivial
>              Labels: Proposed, editorial, request_tc_discussion
>             Fix For: 2.1_csprd03
>
>
> I've noticed that several ITS attributes were anchored using IDs/names starting
> with "itsm_" (e.g.
> http://docs.oasis-open.org/xliff/xliff-core/v2.1/csprd02/xliff-core-v2.1-csprd02.html#itsm_locQualityIssueComment)
> while there are
> now ITS attributes, not ITSM.
> I know it's just because of the historical changes, and this has no relevance
> for conformance, but keeping the IDs with that prefix
> may be a bit confusing, especially since there is no indication in the
> description of the attribute to which namespace it belongs.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2.2#6258)