Review: Message Annotations For Response Routing Version 1.0 (WD02)

I've re-reviewed this document [1] and think there are a few trivial items that need to be addressed before progression to CSD / CSPRD:

Section 2 Response Annotations, first paragraph following "Let us consider an example:"

 The last sentence prior to the bullet points states "G_A is listening on an address T.." - It should instead say something like "G_A has established a receiving link from target T in the remote network" ... the term "listening" has no defined meaning in AMQP.

Section 2.2 Target Capabilities, paragraph following the table.ÂÂ

 "If a target does not support response
annotations, then a which carries the response [...]" - this should read "If a target does not support response annotations, then a message which carries the response [...]"

Section 2.3 Delivery Annotations (RequestÂMessage)

 In the definition for the annotation name "response-address-cookie-expiry". First sentence "If present this delivery annotation [...]" should read "If present, this delivery annotation". In the same paragraph the last sentence currently reads "After this point in time messages sent with the address-cookie annotation set to the value of the response-address-cookie should be expected to be rejected." Do we all agree the a disposition of rejected is correct, and if so what error would we expect to be carried with this?

Given the above comments I think we need a new working draft before progressing to CSD/CSPRD. Does anyone else have any comments on this document?

-- Rob

[1] https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/document.php?document_id=65466&wg_abbrev=amqp
-- 

_____________________________________________________________________________Red Hat GmbH,Âwww.de.redhat.com,Registered seat: Grasbrunn, Commercial register: Amtsgericht Muenchen, HRB 153243,Managing Directors: ,Charles Cachera, Michael Cunningham, Michael O'Neill, Eric Shander