wsrm issues

Enclosed are excerpts from WS Reliability: the most recent schema,
a suggestion I made concerning using ASAP to implement a polling reply 
pattern
and a proposal from others in the group for a reliability namespace 
status request.

My argument is basically that ASAP was designed to deal with the Aspect
of determining the status of a service instance and could be used in 
place of
adding special reliability headers for this purpose.

Again, they expect 1000s of messages a second
and want to piggyback acknowledgements.  I worry the term "service 
instance"
(while also used this way in the Grid Service community) may have
scared people away imagining how it would be implemented.
It seems to me ASAP's treatment of Keys and Context Data are opaque 
enough
to handle it semantically.

What are opinions here about the application of ASAP for this purpose?
I don't want to misapply or stray from the intent of ASAP...


***

WS-Reliability has gone through some changes since the precommittee 
document,
a recent schema writeup is shown below