Business Document Envelope V1.0 comments

Thank you Patrick, that was fast!
Best regards,
Kenneth
On Apr 29, 2015, at 8:09 PM, Patrick Durusau < 
> wrote:
Kenneth,
Sure! Apologies for the confusion. New spreadsheet export attached.
Hope you are having a great week!
Patrick
On 04/29/2015 08:49 PM, Kenneth Bengtsson wrote:
Dear Chet / Patrick
As we went through the comments submitted by Patrick at today’s TC meeting we encountered that the Excel spreadsheet included comments made to the BDX Location CSPRD01 back in December 2013 (namely those numbered TAB-501 to TAB-509). While the confusion  was immediately cleared up and did not have any impact on our work, we agreed that it would be convenient to have the BDX Envelope CSPRD01 comments in one place without unrelated comments to disturb the overview. Would it be possible for you to resend the  Excel sheet with just the BDX Envelope CSPRD01 comments?
Best regards,
Kenneth
From:  Chet Ensign
Date:  Monday, April 27, 2015 at 1:56 PM
To:  Patrick Durusau
Cc:  Kenneth Bengtsson, "  ", "  ",  "  "
Subject:  Re: [bdxr-comment] Business Document Envelope V1.0 comments
Done on our side. The version label is corrected. Apologies for the confusion.
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 11:08 AM, Patrick Durusau
< 
>  wrote:
Kenneth,
I will ask Chet Ensign to bulk change the affects version.
The correct version wasn't entered when I made the comments.
Hope you are at the start of a great week!
Patrick
On 04/27/2015 10:43 AM, Kenneth Bengtsson wrote:
Thank you Patrick for your thorough review! We will be going through your comments one by one, and will be documenting the agreed resolutions.
A minor issue: In the “Affects Version/s” column you have specified “BDX Location CSPRD01” in each row. Unless I hear anything else I will assume you meant “BDX Envelope CSPRD01”.
Best regards,
Kenneth
On 4/25/15, 6:15 PM, "Patrick Durusau" < 
> wrote:
Greetings!
Members of the Technical Advisory Board endeavor to comment on all 30  day public review drafts.
Comments on:
Business Document Envelope V1.0
are attached.
It isn't necessary to acknowledge each comment separately.
A single email acknowledging this email will be sufficient.
If the TC chooses to ?defer? resolution of an issue to a later  version, please choose Defer Issue under Available Workflow Actions  (after opening the issue).
When the TC has acted on these issues, I would appreciate a pointer to  the TCs resolution as the TAB is tracking the resolution of comments
>from TAB members.
Hope everyone is having a great weekend!
Patrick

--
This publicly archived list offers a means to provide input to the  OASIS Business Document Exchange (BDXR)

TC
In order to verify user consent to the Feedback License terms and  to minimize spam in the list archive, subscription is required  before posting.
Subscribe:

Unsubscribe:

List help:

List archive:
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/bdxr-comment/
Feedback License:
http://www.oasis-open.org/who/ipr/feedback_license.pdf
List Guidelines:
http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php
Committee:
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/bdxr
Join OASIS:
http://www.oasis-open.org/join/
Thank you for offering to provide input to the  OASIS Business Document Exchange (BDXR)

TC.
--
/chet

----------------

Chet Ensign  Director of Standards Development and TC Administration   OASIS: Advancing open standards for the information society
http://www.oasis-open.org
Primary: +1 973-996-2298
Mobile: +1 201-341-1393
<BDX-Envelope-25April2015.xls>