Re: [bdxr] Re: [bdxr-comment] Public Review for Service Metadata Publishing (SMP) V1.0 from #BDXR TC - ends May 17th

Hi Philip  Once again thank you for the comments made to the SMP 1.0 public review! To make the comment resolution and documentation process a bit easier to manage, I have made an attempt to separate your entirely grammatical/editorial comments from your comments related to the actual content of the specification.  The content comments I have separated out and put in the draft comment resolution log here:  https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/document.php?document_id=58189&wg_abbrev=bdxr
And the remaining grammatical/editorial comments I have filtered out in the Word document here:  https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/document.php?document_id=58188&wg_abbrev=bdxr
Please let me know if you think anything is missing or misrepresented, or if in any way you feel that the documents above do not entirely represent your comments.  Best regards,  Kenneth
On 5/4/16, 12:22 PM, " on behalf of Kenneth Bengtsson" < on behalf of > wrote:
>Thank you Philip, for you valuable comments. The TC will convene next time on May 25 to start working through the comments received. I will make sure to keep you informed of the progress and to share with you the complete comment resolution log. > > > >
>On 5/4/16, 10:10 AM, " on behalf of " < on behalf of > wrote: > >>Dear all! >> >>Please find attached my comments to the BDXR public review. >>All changes are in “track changes” mode. >>Most of the changes are just minor, and some of them might only be  >>relevant for the next major version. >> >>If you have any questions, don’t hesitate to contact me. >> >>Thanks and best regards >>
Philip Helger