At 2016-05-27 05:07 +0000, Kenneth Bengtsson wrote:
As agreed at this weeks meeting I have continued working through the
comments received to the SMP 1.0 public review
Thanks for your efforts.
...
I would especially appreciate any opinions on comments PEPPOL-016
and PEPPOL-017:
... PEPPOL-016, XML schema: http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing is not required: Any opinions?
PEPPOL-017, XML schema:
http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-wssecurity-utility-1.0.xsd
is not required:
Any opinions?
From my perspective I see no use for either of these
declarations. I note they are not referenced in any way, and so I
think having them there is of no use. I believe they can be removed
without any consequence.
. . . . . . . Ken
--
Check our site for free XML, XSLT, XSL-FO and UBL developer resources
Streaming hands-on XSLT/XPath 2 training @US$45: http://goo.gl/Dd9qBK
Crane Softwrights Ltd. _ _ _ _ _ _ http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/o/
G Ken Holman _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ mailto:
Google+ blog _ _ _ _ _ http://plus.google.com/+GKenHolman-Crane/posts
Legal business disclaimers: _ _ http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/legal
--- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
