SMP comment resolution

Thank you Ken!  Unless I hear of any objections I will go ahead and mark the two comments as accepted, and remove the references from the schema.  Best regards,  Kenneth
On 5/27/16, 8:55 AM, "G. Ken Holman" < on behalf of > wrote:
>At 2016-05-27 05:07 +0000, Kenneth Bengtsson wrote: >>As agreed at this weeks meeting I have continued working through the  >>comments received to the SMP 1.0 public review >
>Thanks for your efforts. > >>... >>I would especially appreciate any opinions on comments PEPPOL-016  >>and PEPPOL-017: >>... >>PEPPOL-016, XML schema:  http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing  is not required: >>Any opinions? >> >>PEPPOL-017, XML schema:  >> http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-wssecurity-utility-1.0.xsd
>>is not required: >>Any opinions? >
> From my perspective I see no use for either of these
>declarations.  I note they are not referenced in any way, and so I
>think having them there is of no use.  I believe they can be removed
>without any consequence. > >. . . . . . . Ken > > >--
>Check our site for free XML, XSLT, XSL-FO and UBL developer resources
>Streaming hands-on XSLT/XPath 2 training @US$45:  http://goo.gl/Dd9qBK
>Crane Softwrights Ltd. _ _ _ _ _ _  http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/o/
>G Ken Holman _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _  mailto:
>Google+ blog _ _ _ _ _  http://plus.google.com/+GKenHolman-Crane/posts
>Legal business disclaimers: _ _  http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/legal
> > >---
>This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus  >