Re: interposition requirements

From
Sazi Temel <>
Date
2001-05-02T02:36:50+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: interposition requirements
At 10:54 AM 5/1/01 +0100, Mark Little wrote:
><<<<
>We can neither disallow (sub participants registering with coordinator) 
>nor force. There is no way that coordinator can know it... and looks like 
>hiding the subtransaction will not harm the transaction anyway.. so the 
>coordinator site may want to include its wish to have a flat transaction 
>structure(all the participants register with the coordinator) and 
>participants may try to comply with it (if they wish!)
> >>>>
>Subtransaction? Sub-coordination surely? Interposition isn't the same as 
>subtransaction (or nested transaction).
>
I do not mean a sub-transaction or netsted transaction per proper 
definition.. Ok, lets call it a new transaction, a transaction that the 
main coordinator is not aware of, but its outcome may affect the 
transaction that the main coordinator is managing.

>Mark.
>
>----------------------------------------------
>Dr. Mark Little (<mailto:>)
>Transactions Architect, HP Arjuna Labs
>Phone +44 191 2064538
>Fax   +44 191 2064203
>
>