Re: [cacao] Terminology Committee Note

My thoughts, after talking with Allan is, I think this is a good idea.  We can capture the data as a committee note and rev it as needed.  Then when we get ready to release the spec, we can either fold in certain content or reference it as needed.  But by doing this, we stop having the same content in multiple places.
John, I assume that you will help flesh out the terminology and add extra content as needed?  I can split the documents today and get new working drafts uploaded to Kavi.
Thanks,
Bret
PGP Fingerprint:
63B4 FC53 680A 6B7D 1447  F2C0 74F8 ACAE 7415 0050
"Without cryptography vihv vivc ce xhrnrw, however, the only thing that can not be unscrambled is an egg."
On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 12:05 PM John Morris < 
> wrote:
Hi Allan,
My thought was a singular doc to be shared as an input to multiple specs. That said it would have to be the case that, although there may be opinions resulting in multiple approaches, that there would still need to be agreement by the TC upon a single playbook terminology. Otherwise I suppose I would not be in favor of a committee note and we would require allowing it to diverge into two terminologies organic to each document.
Thanks,
John