Martin,
I think this demands a different approach - because we obviously
cannot be adding in namespaces when the content does not have
them.
What about adding something to the <properties> section - where
you could either filter a prefix in or out?
Basically the prefix is only there to fool the way the parsing code
has been written - so I HATE to make this the way it works.
Really - long term - that code should be fixed. But in the shortterm
you could pre-parse each input line before it gets to the XML
parser and massage it.
Nothing is pretty here. Misuse of namespaces are just killing.
Thoughts?
Thanks, DW.
========================================================
Message text written by INTERNET:
>
So if you look at the examples I sent you will see that the CAM
template has the namespace for the bod associated with the prefix bod.
The xml file that conforms to that template does not require a prefix as
CAM will match via the namespace uri not the prefix.
<
