[ https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/CAMP-223?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=67218#comment-67218 ]
Anish Karmarkar commented on CAMP-223:
--------------------------------------
The TC agreed that this required no change. We don't quite know what kinds of "namespaces" will be used. Will have to wait till best practices emerge.
See https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/camp/download.php/61273/20170720Minutes.txt
> 4.2.1 Types "encouraged" -> SHOULD?
> -----------------------------------
>
> Key: CAMP-223
> URL: https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/CAMP-223
> Project: OASIS Cloud Application Management for Platforms (CAMP) TC
> Issue Type: Bug
> Environment: Normative
> Reporter: Chet Ensign
>
> 4.2.1 in addition to being a disclaimer of what CAMP (this specification?) does not define, contains the following:
> "...To promote portability, both providers and consumers of the CAMP API are encouraged to namespace-qualify the types that they use....."
> Isn't that a normative SHOULD?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2.2#6258)
