RE: [chairs] Re-visiting IPR and OASIS

From
Hal Lockhart <>
Date
2004-12-15T15:54:39+00:00
ID
Thread
RE: [chairs] Re-visiting IPR and OASIS
I am 
surprised there is no mention of the FTC proposals for reforming the US patent 
system, which are intended to address some of the problems specifically 
mentioned in the paper.

 

Hal

  
-----Original Message-----
From: David RR Webber 
  [mailto:]
Sent: Thursday, December 09, 2004 2:22 
  PM
To: Chairs OASIS
Subject: [chairs] Re-visiting IPR and 
  OASIS

  
Team,

  
 

  
The article here provides many insights and 
  raises questions.

  
 

  
It would be interesting to have feedback from 
  OASIS on exactly

  
how many of the issues raised are specifically 
  addressed by

  
the proposed IPR changes for OASIS - as I'm sure 
  as Chairs

  
we are going to get asked these same questions by 
  our

  
constituents.

  
 

  
Thanks, DW

  
===============================================

  
 

  
The Problem of Software Patents in Standards
Bruce Perens, Paper for 
  Brussels FFII "Regulating Knowledge" Conference

Patents, originally 
  created to stimulate innovation, may now be having
the opposite effect, at 
  least in the software industry. Plagued by an
exponential growth in 
  software patents, many of which are not valid,
software vendors and 
  developers must navigate a potential minefield to
avoid patent infringement 
  and future lawsuits. Coupled with strategies
to exploit this confusion over 
  patents, especially in standards setting
organizations, it appears that 
  software advancement will become stifled
unless legal action is taken to 
  resolve the situation. This article
examines the current situation facing 
  software developers and users,
the methods employed by standards setting 
  organizations to address
these problems, and recommends strategies for 
  resolving the problem
caused by software patents.

http://www.perens.com/Articles/PatentFarming.html
See 
  also the Conference Program: 
http://en.eu.ffii.org/sections/bxl0411/program/