David-
Can you explain to me how your proposal is different than sites
(and there are several, last time I looked) like the one you mention?
Why is the PTO going to pay any more attention to this effort? While I
do think it would be interesting for OASIS pursue something like this,
I'd hate for it to be ignored just like previous efforts.
-Gabe
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Webber (XML) [mailto:]
> Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 8:19 AM
> To: Chairs OASIS
> Subject: Re: [chairs] Of un-patents and un-inventions
>
> Elysa,
>
> I'm open to better suggestions!
>
> BTW - seems like the patent approach to this is
> http://www.researchdisclosure.com/
> but again this IMHO falls into the same bear trap we are
> trying to avoid -
> eg -
> this just sucks you down into the morass that is the USPTO -
> we're trying to
> ensure
> we stay away from all that.
>
> I've had a suggest of other terms like "open invention", or
> "freely reusable
> idea".
>
> I also think we need "obvious and self-evident" in there too....
>
> Thanks, DW
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Elysa Jones" <>
> To: "David Webber (XML)" <>; "Chairs OASIS"
> <>
> Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 10:57 AM
> Subject: Re: [chairs] Of un-patents and un-inventions
>
>
> > Except for the name, I think this is the best idea I have
> heard yet wrt
> IPR!
> > Cheers,
> > Elysa Jones, EM-TC
> >
>
>
>
