I discussed this topic (from the angle of TCs being able to actively
advertise their work as being licensed in an "open source compatible"
way) in a previous email to this list [1] (with additional discussion in
[2]).
In short, I think this topic needs active attention by OASIS, and I know
that at least one OASIS board member understands my passion about this
topic.
-Gabe
[1] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/chairs/200502/msg00009.html
[2] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/chairs/200504/msg00004.html
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Webber (XML) [mailto:]
> Sent: Monday, November 21, 2005 4:40 PM
> To: Chairs OASIS
> Subject: [chairs] OASIS IPR examined in ZDNET article
>
> http://blogs.zdnet.com/BTL/?p=1597
>
> Fabulous journalism.
>
> Very informative.
>
> I would love to have a telephone conference call between
> OASIS' legal counsel Mr. Andy Updegrove and
> interested OASIS TC Chairs on the topic of the distinctions
> between the OSI license requirements and the current OASIS
> 3 flavours of IPR policy so we can better inform our TC \
> members as they approach decisions on their possible
> selection of an OASIS IPR mode.
>
> Thanks, DW
>
