i would offer that a forum is better suited to (persistent) Q&A where
a blog is more editorially oriented. since i thought that the purpose
was to allow for some form of reusable public Q&A a forum would be
the better choice in that it allows users to create topics that can
start threads of discussion.
b
On Feb 14, 2006, at 12:20 PM, David RR Webber (XML) wrote:
> Bill,
>
> OK - weeds, eh?
>
> The blogger environment allows you to create persistent html pages
> - complete with archive and indexing - as well as the RSS content -
> and Google search loves it all!
>
> DW
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: [chairs] TC FAQ Template
> From: Bill Parducci <>
> Date: Tue, February 14, 2006 1:07 pm
> To: Jeff Mischkinsky <>
> Cc:
>
> without spinning to far out into the weeds i would suggest that a
> forum would be a better solution here. the are searchable,
> 'skinnable', can easily be setup to allow anonymous reads (good for
> google searches ;o) while requiring authentication (read: "by signing
> up you agree to abide by X "), typically have RSS feed capabilities
> and allow you to keep things in some sort of order by topic.
>
> b
