+1 to SVN. If it is coupled with tracking systems like Trac, that is
even better.
Actually, developping document that way is also worth considering as it
would allow no-brainer version control and change tracking as well as
concurrent editing by multiple editors, but I guess that would be a
future item for consideration.
=nat
Drummond Reed wrote:
>
> +1 to SVN.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> *From:* Duane Nickull [mailto:]
> *Sent:* Monday, October 20, 2008 9:03 PM
> *To:* ;
> *Cc:* ; ;
> ;
> *Subject:* Re: [chairs] Recommendations for Version Control System!
>
>
>
> +1
> Aus mein Blackberry/from my Blackberry
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> *From*: Mike Edwards
> *To*: Patil, Sanjay
> *Cc*: ; ;
> ;
> *Sent*: Mon Oct 20 11:46:36 2008
> *Subject*: Re: [chairs] Recommendations for Version Control System!
>
>
> Folks,
>
> I vote for SVN (Subversion)
>
> Yours, Mike.
>
> Strategist - Emerging Technologies, SCA & SDO.
> Co Chair OASIS SCA Assembly TC.
> IBM Hursley Park, Mail Point 146, Winchester, SO21 2JN, Great Britain.
> Phone & FAX: +44-1962-818014 Mobile: +44-7802-467431
> Email:
>
> From:
>
>
>
> "Patil, Sanjay" <>
>
> To:
>
>
>
> <>, <>,
> <>
>
> Cc:
>
>
>
> <>
>
> Date:
>
>
>
> 20/10/2008 19:04
>
> Subject:
>
>
>
> [chairs] Recommendations for Version Control System!
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> Hi Mary and Chairs of the OASIS TCs,
>
> I would like to seek your input regarding selection of a Version
> Control System (VCS) for use by the OpenCSA TCs.
>
> Most of the TCs under the OpenCSA Member Section are chartered to
> deliver a test suite (for testing conformant implementations). For the
> sake of consistency and reuse, the various OpenCSA TCs are planning to
> collaborate in developing the different parts of the test suite (test
> harness, test cases, etc). As you can imagine, this effort requires
> using a Version Control System (VCS) that is more powerful and
> flexible than what is currently provided by Kavi. Using SourceForge
> infrastructure would be one option in this regard. However before
> making any decision, we would like to know if you have any
> recommendations for VCS based on the experiences of your TC, any known
> issues such as user account management, IPR, etc.
>
> I am posting the above inquiry on behalf of the OpenCSA Steering
> Committee's Liaison Subcommittee which is planning to meet on coming
> Thursday (10/23). Your response before coming Thursday is therefore
> greatly appreciated.
>
> Regards,
> Sanjay
> Co-Chair - OpenCSA Liaison Subcommittee
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> /Unless stated otherwise above:
> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with
> number 741598.
> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
> 3AU/
>
>
>
>
>
