Hm,
this puts property structure into the identifier. Is this really a good
idea?
Florent Guillaume wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Reading the namespace proposal, I feel it could allow for interesting
complex properties with the following small modification. I would like
to allow full-digits intermediate "prefixes", in order to have
properties named like:
>
> MyRepository:Finance:Orders:42:OrderNumber
> MyRepository:Finance:Orders:42:OrderTitle
> MyRepository:Finance:Orders:42:OrderCustomers:0:CustomerId
>
> This would allow exposing complex properties that contain lists of
subproperties.
> ...
As CMIS doesn't have residual properties, would that mean that all of
these properties would need to be defined on the document type?
BR, Julian
--
<green/>bytes GmbH, Hafenweg 16, D-48155 Münster, Germany
Amtsgericht Münster: HRB5782
