Re: [coel] BAP uploaded

Hi Joss,

I'm just reviewing your changes and
noticed that you use 'WILL' rather than 'SHALL' which is the appropriate
keyword from RFC2119. I've also stumbled upon a misspelt abbreviation.
I'll upload a corrected version shortly.

You are right that the specification
does not explicitly state that scheme 1 is a minimum. Although it is possible
to logically derive 'B' from 'A' I think we should make it clearer for
the reader and state B. I'll put in some appropriate words and also elevate
the use of authentication to a MUST. I'll upload a revised copy later this
morning.

I'm not sure what you mean by your 'migrating'
question: We have bee applying changes to the documents under new 'WD02'
names and I understand that these will form the basis of the next draft.
Have I missed something?

Regards

Paul

Dr. Paul Bruton

Tessella

Chadwick House, Birchwood Park, Warrington, WA3 6AE

E: ,
T: +44 (0)7557 916535

www.tessella.com
   Registered in England No. 1466429

Please consider the environment
and do not print this e-mail unless you really need to.

This message is commercial in confidence and
may be privileged. It is intended for the addressee only. Access to this
message by anyone else is unauthorised and strictly prohibited. If you
have received this message in error, please inform the sender immediately.
Please note that messages sent or received by the Tessella e-mail system
may be monitored and stored in an information retrieval system.

From:      
 Joss <>

To:      
 ""
<>

Date:      
 02/02/2016 07:25

Subject:    
   [coel] BAP uploaded

Sent by:    
   <>

I’d just uploaded the BAP with some simple additions
for COEL-50.

 

A couple of questions:

·         On the
BAP – in 2.2.2 I can see scheme 1 & scheme 2 for posting atoms but
I’m not sure that it says scheme 1 MUST be implemented as a minimum. Also
in 2.3 it suggests that it is OK to run scheme 2 with anonymous TLS only
– do we really want people to do this? I assumed that we would be looking
at scheme 1 with anonymous TLS only as a minimum and scheme 2 with authentication
as an option.

·         Generally,
now that we have a published committee specification, should we be migrating
our WD2 changes on these originals?

 

Regards

Joss

 

 

Joss Langford

Technical Director

Activinsights Ltd 

 

Tel: 01480 862080

MBL 07712 886208

www.geneactiv.co.uk

 

Important Information:  The contents of this email
are intended for the named addresses only and contain information which
is confidential and which may also be privileged.  Unless you are
the named addressee (or authorised to receive for the addressee) you may
not copy,  use it, or disclose it to anyone else.  If you received
it in error, please notify us immediately at 
and then destroy it.  Further, whilst we make efforts to keep our
network free from computer viruses, etc., you do need to check this email
and any attachments to it for viruses as we can take no responsibility
for any viruses which might be transferred by way of this email. 

 

Activinsights Limited, Unit 11, Harvard Industrial Estate,
Kimbolton, Cambs, PE28 0NJ.  A company registered in England &
Wales. Registered number: 06576069