On 2017-04-12 14:35, Vincent Danen wrote:
> This is something we probably want to look at for CSAF 2.0, not CVRF
> 1.2. I don't think it can be resolved easily. You could have 12
> different CVSSv2 scores right now but it's almost pointless if you can't
> map that back to a particular product or scenario.
Agreed. Thus, I'm proposing that CVRF 1.2 should allow zero or one CVSS
v2 score and zero or one CVSS v3 score.
A separate question remains: If there is a CVSS score, must it be v3
(and have an optional single v2 score)? My position is that the score
can be either v2 or v3 (or both).
- Art
