Re: Suggestion to postpone the April meeting to May 4

PS – Since the issue appears to be the fact we didn’t line up the comment close with when we’d like to hold a meeting to vote, one suggestion might be to have a motion at the 4/25 meeting to delegate to anyone  willing to hold a working meeting (ie not counting towards voting rights) comment review meeting May 4 th  and send the output of that meeting out for electronic ballot May 5 th   or whatever makes sense. That way you could have your cake (not dorking with dates of voting meetings) and eat it too (getting it out expeditiously for ballot). We have done similar in other TC’s before.

--
Duncan Sparrell
sFractal Consulting LLC
iPhone, iTypo, iApologize
I welcome VSRE emails. Learn more at  http://vsre.info /
From:
 <> on behalf of duncan sfractal.com <>
Date:  Sunday, April 24, 2022 at 10:32 AM
To:  Omar Santos (osantos) <>, Schmidt, Thomas <>,  <>
Subject:  [csaf] Re: Suggestion to postpone the April meeting to May 4
Could you please be clear on when we are holding voting meetings (ie can vote on stuff, and counts towards voting rights)? Is  https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/csaf/calendar.php  accurate for April and May?

--
Duncan Sparrell
sFractal Consulting LLC
iPhone, iTypo, iApologize
I welcome VSRE emails. Learn more at  http://vsre.info /
From:
 <> on behalf of Omar Santos (osantos) <>
Date:  Friday, April 22, 2022 at 2:28 PM
To:  Schmidt, Thomas <>,  <>
Subject:  [csaf] Re: Suggestion to postpone the April meeting to May 4
I suggest to still have the call on Wednesday, as we will have a few announcements. We can probably meet again in mid May (i.e., May 18 th ).

Regards,

Omar Santos
PSIRT, Security Research and Operations
Cisco Systems
Email: 
PGP: https://cs.co/os-pgp-key


On 4/22/22, 12:45 PM, "" <> wrote:
Dear colleagues,

our next regular meeting would be April 27. However, the public review is then still in progress as it ends 29 April 2022 at 23:59 UTC. According to the rules of OASIS we are not allowed to decide on the comments  before the review period ends. Therefore, I suggest that we either

a) postpone the April meeting one week and hold it on May 4 (preferred) or
b) add an additional meeting on May 4 (if we have pending topics for the April meeting)

Stefan and I would provide suggestions for the comment resolution for the meeting on May 4. However, for the meeting and our progress to CS02 to be effective it is crucial that we reach quorum.

Thoughts?

Best wishes,
Thomas

--
Thomas Schmidt