Re: [cti-stix] Proposal - Top Level Relationship Object

From
Bret Jordan
Date
2015-07-30T22:18:00+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: [cti-stix] Proposal - Top Level Relationship Object
Lets try and finish this up tomorrow, Friday.  I would like to see us start work on the Sighting Object the week after BH/DC.
Outstanding Items:
1) How do we handle an unknown start / end time?  Do we just leave it blank or do we actually put in  unknown  or a zeroed out date/time?
2) Are these values good for the Confidence Vocab?
3) What should the Type Vocab be, is this really needed?
4) How do we handle a more elaborate object marking?  Do we add a Marking_Detail as an object like I said earlier?
5) Do we really need multiple targets?  Just trying to make sure John's question gets enough focus.
Thanks,
Bret
Bret Jordan CISSP
Director of Security Architecture and Standards
Office of the CTO  Blue Coat Systems
PGP Fingerprint: 63B4 FC53 680A 6B7D 1447  F2C0 74F8 ACAE 7415 0050
Without cryptography vihv vivc ce xhrnrw, however, the only thing that can not be unscrambled is an egg.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description:  Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail