Re: MTI Binding

JSON does have schema and we have used it to create schema validation for JSON based TAXII which is in the wild today.

http://json-schema.org/

http://json-schema.org/latest/json-schema-core.html

I am not against looking at RDF in JSON, but I would like to understand why it would be valuable over native JSON. Meaning, what does it give us and what is the complexity cost of using it for open source, web application, and APP developers. I want things as simple as possible to help us gain a higher percentage of adoption.  

Thanks,

Bret

Bret Jordan CISSP
Director of Security Architecture and Standards | Office of the CTO

Blue Coat Systems

PGP Fingerprint: 63B4 FC53 680A 6B7D 1447  F2C0 74F8 ACAE 7415 0050

"Without cryptography vihv vivc ce xhrnrw, however, the only thing that can not be unscrambled is an egg." 

On Sep 30, 2015, at 18:20, Cory Casanave <> wrote:

What about RDF in JSON? This then has a well defined schema.

 

From:  [mailto:] On Behalf Of Jordan, BretSent: Wednesday, September 30, 2015 6:56 PMTo: ; : [cti-users] MTI Binding

 

From the comments so far on the github wiki [1], the consensus right now from the community is for JSON to be used as the MTI (mandatory to implement) binding for STIX. For those that agree or disagree or have a different opinion, please update at least the final Conclusions section with your opinion.  

 

[1] https://github.com/STIXProject/schemas/wiki/MTI-Format-Analysis

 

Thanks,

 

Bret

 

 

 

Bret Jordan CISSP

Director of Security Architecture and Standards | Office of the CTO

Blue Coat Systems

PGP Fingerprint: 63B4 FC53 680A 6B7D 1447  F2C0 74F8 ACAE 7415 0050

"Without cryptography vihv vivc ce xhrnrw, however, the only thing that can not be unscrambled is an egg." 

Attachment:
signature.asc

Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail