Thanks for the opportunity to weigh in. I apologize in advance if my comment comes across as contrarian. Blame it on my newness to this group.
Side note: The GitHub wiki is not optimal for threaded discussions. On a call yesterday, I thought someone mentioned Atlassian Confluence. Is that a possibility, or is there another OASIS-sponsored forum where we could carry on discussions?
JSA
From: <> on behalf of Wunder, John A. <>
Sent: Thursday, October 1, 2015 9:17 AM
To: Cory Casanave
Cc: Jordan, Bret; ;
Subject: [cti-stix] Re: [cti-users] MTI Binding
Can you elaborate a little, Cory? What are the advantages of RDF in JSON vs. either native JSON, native XML, or RDF in XML? What are the disadvantages?
If you could fill it out on the wiki that would be awesome, but if not then e-mail is fine too.
John
https://github.com/STIXProject/schemas/wiki/MTI-Format-Analysis
MTI Format Analysis · STIXProject/schemas Wiki · GitHub
schemas - STIX Schema Development
Read
more...
On Sep 30, 2015, at 8:20 PM, Cory Casanave <> wrote:
What about RDF in JSON? This then has a well defined schema.
From: [mailto:]
On Behalf Of Jordan, Bret
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2015 6:56 PM
To: ;
Subject: [cti-users] MTI Binding
From the comments so far on the github wiki [1], the consensus right now from the community is for JSON to be used as the MTI (mandatory to implement) binding for STIX. For those that agree or disagree or have a different opinion, please update at least the
final Conclusions section with your opinion.
[1] https://github.com/STIXProject/schemas/wiki/MTI-Format-Analysis
Thanks,
Bret
Bret Jordan CISSP
Director of Security Architecture and Standards | Office of the CTO
Blue Coat Systems
PGP Fingerprint: 63B4 FC53 680A 6B7D 1447 F2C0 74F8 ACAE 7415 0050
"Without cryptography vihv vivc ce xhrnrw, however, the only thing that can not be unscrambled is an egg."
