On 28.10.2015 18:12:32, Barnum, Sean D. wrote:
>
> So, we would like to propose officially establishing that the
> following two issues are the active issues currently under
> consideration for STIX v2.0:
>
> * Abstract Sightings into an independent construct rather than
> embedded within Indicator
> <https://github.com/STIXProject/schemas/issues/306>
> (<https://github.com/STIXProject/schemas/issues/306>#306)<https://github.com/STIXProject/schemas/issues/306>
>
> * Abstract relationships as top-level constructs rather than
> embedded within other constructs
> <https://github.com/STIXProject/schemas/issues/291>
> (<https://github.com/STIXProject/schemas/issues/291>#291)<https://github.com/STIXProject/schemas/issues/291>
>
Hey, Sean -
I like this approach. Those two constructs are interrelated, have long
been hot topics, and seem like a very sensible place to focus our
discussion. +1
--
Cheers,
Trey
--
Trey Darley
Senior Security Engineer
4DAA 0A88 34BC 27C9 FD2B A97E D3C6 5C74 0FB7 E430
Soltra | An FS-ISAC & DTCC Company
www.soltra.com
--
"Good, Fast, Cheap: Pick any two (you can't have all three)." --RFC 1925
